2004 Ford Falcon vs. 1942 Skoda Superb
To start off, 2004 Ford Falcon is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Skoda Superb. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Skoda Superb would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Falcon (220 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 1942 Skoda Superb. (79 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1942 Skoda Superb. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Skoda Superb weights approximately 285 kg more than 2004 Ford Falcon.
Because 2004 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1942 Skoda Superb, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Falcon | 1942 Skoda Superb | |
Make | Ford | Skoda |
Model | Falcon | Superb |
Year Released | 2004 | 1942 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3984 cc | 3137 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1730 mm |