2004 Ford Falcon vs. 1980 Nissan Cherry
To start off, 2004 Ford Falcon is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Nissan Cherry. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Nissan Cherry would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Falcon weights approximately 740 kg more than 1980 Nissan Cherry.
Because 2004 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Nissan Cherry, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Falcon | 1980 Nissan Cherry | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Falcon | Cherry |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3984 cc | 988 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 775 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1610 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2400 mm |
