2004 Ford Falcon vs. 1981 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2004 Ford Falcon is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Falcon weights approximately 705 kg more than 1981 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 2004 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Falcon | 1981 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Falcon | Colt |
Year Released | 2004 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3984 cc | 1244 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2310 mm |