2004 Ford Falcon vs. 1996 Suzuki Baleno
To start off, 2004 Ford Falcon is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Suzuki Baleno. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Suzuki Baleno would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Falcon (220 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1996 Suzuki Baleno. (119 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1996 Suzuki Baleno. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Falcon weights approximately 480 kg more than 1996 Suzuki Baleno. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Falcon (357 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 205 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Suzuki Baleno. (152 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Suzuki Baleno.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Falcon | 1996 Suzuki Baleno | |
Make | Ford | Suzuki |
Model | Falcon | Baleno |
Year Released | 2004 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3984 cc | 1839 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 357 Nm | 152 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 92.3 mm | 84.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99.3 mm | 83 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 1035 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2390 mm |