2004 Ford Falcon vs. 1996 Volvo 850

To start off, 2004 Ford Falcon is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Volvo 850. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Volvo 850 would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Falcon (220 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1996 Volvo 850. (124 HP @ 6100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1996 Volvo 850. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Falcon weights approximately 125 kg more than 1996 Volvo 850. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2004 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Volvo 850, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Falcon (357 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 187 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Volvo 850. (170 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Volvo 850.

Compare all specifications: