2004 Ford Falcon vs. 2010 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2010 Holden Colorado is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Falcon (220 HP) has 10 more horse power than 2010 Holden Colorado. (210 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Colorado.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Falcon (357 Nm) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Colorado. (313 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Colorado.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Falcon | 2010 Holden Colorado | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | Falcon | Colorado |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3984 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 210 HP |
| Torque | 357 Nm | 313 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
