2004 Ford Falcon vs. 2010 Renault Laguna

To start off, 2010 Renault Laguna is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Falcon (220 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 2010 Renault Laguna. (168 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Laguna.

Because 2004 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Laguna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Falcon (357 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Renault Laguna. (270 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Renault Laguna.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Ford Falcon 2010 Renault Laguna
Make Ford Renault
Model Falcon Laguna
Year Released 2004 2010
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3984 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 220 HP 168 HP
Engine RPM 4900 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 357 Nm 270 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 3250 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.6:1 9.5:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4910 mm 4590 mm
Vehicle Width 1880 mm 1440 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1760 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 2750 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 59 L 70 L