2004 Ford Focus vs. 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud II
To start off, 2004 Ford Focus is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud II would be higher. At 6,223 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud II is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud II weights approximately 923 kg more than 2004 Ford Focus.
Because 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud II is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud II. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Focus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Focus | 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud II | |
Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Focus | Silver Cloud II |
Year Released | 2004 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 6223 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 104.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 91.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 8.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 2108 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 5380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 3130 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 81 L |