2004 Ford Focus vs. 1963 TVR Griffith
To start off, 2004 Ford Focus is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 TVR Griffith. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 TVR Griffith would be higher. At 4,727 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 TVR Griffith is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Focus weights approximately 491 kg more than 1963 TVR Griffith.
Because 1963 TVR Griffith is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 TVR Griffith. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Focus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Focus | 1963 TVR Griffith | |
| Make | Ford | TVR |
| Model | Focus | Griffith |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1599 cc | 4727 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 135 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1356 kg | 865 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 3560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2170 mm |
