2004 Ford Focus vs. 2006 Mazda 6
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Focus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Focus would be higher. At 2,966 cc, 2006 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 2004 Ford Focus. (136 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Focus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Focus weights approximately 255 kg more than 2006 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 6 (270 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Focus. (162 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Focus.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Focus | 2006 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Focus | 6 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 2966 cc |
Horse Power | 136 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 162 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1384 kg | 1129 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 4.6 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 7.4 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.6 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |