2004 Ford Focus vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Focus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Focus would be higher. At 2,487 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 2004 Ford Focus. (130 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Focus.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Focus (183 Nm) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 6. (167 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Focus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Focus | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Focus | 6 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1983 cc | 2487 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 183 Nm | 167 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1850 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.3 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 9.2 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |