2004 Ford Focus vs. 2011 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2011 Toyota Matrix is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Focus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Focus would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Toyota Matrix (158 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 2004 Ford Focus. (130 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Focus.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Toyota Matrix (219 Nm) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Focus. (183 Nm). This means 2011 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Focus.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Focus | 2011 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Focus | Matrix |
Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1983 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 183 Nm | 219 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2601 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.3 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 9.2 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 50 L |