2004 Ford Focus vs. 2012 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2012 Toyota Matrix is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Focus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Focus would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Toyota Matrix (132 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2004 Ford Focus. (113 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Focus.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Toyota Matrix (173 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Focus. (160 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2012 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Focus.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Focus | 2012 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Focus | Matrix |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 113 HP | 132 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 173 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4366 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2601 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 50 L |