2004 Ford Freestar vs. 1999 Nissan Z
To start off, 2004 Ford Freestar is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan Z would be higher. At 3,802 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Freestar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Nissan Z (197 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2004 Ford Freestar. (193 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Nissan Z should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Freestar.
Because 1999 Nissan Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Nissan Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Freestar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Freestar (325 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Nissan Z. (245 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Freestar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Nissan Z.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Freestar | 1999 Nissan Z | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Freestar | Z |
Year Released | 2004 | 1999 |
Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3802 cc | 2389 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 193 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 325 Nm | 245 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2450 mm |