2004 Ford Freestar vs. 2008 Mazda Rustler
To start off, 2008 Mazda Rustler is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Freestar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Freestar would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Freestar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Freestar weights approximately 989 kg more than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Freestar (357 Nm) has 255 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda Rustler. (102 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Freestar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda Rustler. 2004 Ford Freestar has automatic transmission and 2008 Mazda Rustler has manual transmission. 2008 Mazda Rustler will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Ford Freestar will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Freestar | 2008 Mazda Rustler | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Freestar | Rustler |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1323 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 202 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 357 Nm | 102 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 97 mm | 71 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95 mm | 83.6 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1939 kg | 950 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3070 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 54 L |