2004 Ford Freestar vs. 2011 Chrysler 200
To start off, 2011 Chrysler 200 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Freestar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Freestar would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Freestar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Freestar (202 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2011 Chrysler 200. (173 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Freestar should accelerate faster than 2011 Chrysler 200.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Freestar (357 Nm) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Chrysler 200. (225 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Freestar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Chrysler 200.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Freestar | 2011 Chrysler 200 | |
Make | Ford | Chrysler |
Model | Freestar | 200 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 202 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 357 Nm | 225 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 4869 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1483 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3070 mm | 2766 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.2 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 64 L |