2004 Ford Freestyle vs. 1972 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2004 Ford Freestyle is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Freestyle is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Freestyle (210 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Freestyle should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Freestyle weights approximately 853 kg more than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Freestyle (281 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Freestyle will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Freestyle | 1972 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Freestyle | Cosmo |
Year Released | 2004 | 1972 |
Body Type | Crossover | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 281 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1795 kg | 942 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2210 mm |