2004 Ford Fusion vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2004 Ford Fusion is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Triumph 2000 (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2004 Ford Fusion. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Fusion. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Fusion weights approximately 7 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Fusion (160 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Fusion will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Fusion | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | Fusion | 2000 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1397 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1177 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 64 L |