2004 Ford Fusion vs. 1965 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2004 Ford Fusion is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Ford Fusion is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Lotus Elan (104 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2004 Ford Fusion. (99 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Fusion. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Fusion weights approximately 491 kg more than 1965 Lotus Elan.
Because 1965 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Fusion, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Fusion | 1965 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Ford | Lotus |
Model | Fusion | Elan |
Year Released | 2004 | 1965 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1558 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1151 kg | 660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 45 L |