2004 Ford GT vs. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2004 Ford GT is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 5,409 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford GT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford GT weights approximately 200 kg more than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2004 Ford GT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford GT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford GT | 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Ford | Oldsmobile |
| Model | GT | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5409 cc | 2260 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 494 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2680 mm |
