2004 Ford Ka vs. 1960 Jeep CJ5

To start off, 2004 Ford Ka is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,197 cc (4 cylinders), 1960 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Ka (94 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1960 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1960 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 11 kg more than 2004 Ford Ka.

Because 1960 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Ford Ka. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1960 Jeep CJ5 (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Ka. (135 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1960 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Ka.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Ford Ka 1960 Jeep CJ5
Make Ford Jeep
Model Ka CJ5
Year Released 2004 1960
Body Type Hatchback SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1598 cc 2197 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 94 HP 59 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 3600 RPM
Torque 135 Nm 145 Nm
Torque RPM 4250 RPM 3600 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Drive Type Front 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1019 kg 1030 kg
Vehicle Length 3660 mm 3520 mm
Vehicle Width 1650 mm 1550 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1740 mm
Wheelbase Size 2490 mm 2060 mm