2004 Ford Ka vs. 1979 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2004 Ford Ka is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Ka weights approximately 60 kg more than 1979 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 1979 Nissan Bluebird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Nissan Bluebird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Ka | 1979 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Ka | Bluebird |
Year Released | 2004 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1594 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1105 kg | 1045 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2660 mm |