2004 Ford Ka vs. 1991 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2004 Ford Ka is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Lotus Elan (160 HP) has 66 more horse power than 2004 Ford Ka. (94 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Ka weights approximately 22 kg more than 1991 Lotus Elan.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Lotus Elan (143 Nm) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Ka. (135 Nm). This means 1991 Lotus Elan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Ka | 1991 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Ford | Lotus |
Model | Ka | Elan |
Year Released | 2004 | 1991 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1588 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 160 HP |
Torque | 135 Nm | 143 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 82.1 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.5 mm | 79 mm |
Top Speed | 174 km/hour | 196 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1019 kg | 997 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 3810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2260 mm |