2004 Ford Ka vs. 2000 Rover 45
To start off, 2004 Ford Ka is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Rover 45. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Rover 45 would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Rover 45 (102 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2004 Ford Ka. (94 HP @ 5650 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Rover 45 should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Ka.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Ka (135 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Rover 45. (127 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Rover 45.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Ka | 2000 Rover 45 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | Ka | 45 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1394 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 5650 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.1 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.5 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1105 kg | 1105 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 54 L |