2004 Ford Laser vs. 2000 Lotus Extreme
To start off, 2004 Ford Laser is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Lotus Extreme. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Lotus Extreme would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Ford Laser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotus Extreme (120 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2004 Ford Laser. (105 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotus Extreme should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Laser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Laser weights approximately 659 kg more than 2000 Lotus Extreme.
Because 2000 Lotus Extreme is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Lotus Extreme. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Laser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lotus Extreme (180 Nm) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Laser. (145 Nm). This means 2000 Lotus Extreme will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Laser.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Laser | 2000 Lotus Extreme | |
Make | Ford | Lotus |
Model | Laser | Extreme |
Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 700 cc |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 7800 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 180 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1115 kg | 456 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 3510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2420 mm |