2004 Ford Lynx vs. 1970 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2004 Ford Lynx is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1970 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Nissan Cedric (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2004 Ford Lynx. (108 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Lynx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 180 kg more than 2004 Ford Lynx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1970 Nissan Cedric (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Lynx. (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1970 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Lynx.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Lynx | 1970 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Lynx | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 165 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1290 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2700 mm |
