2004 Ford Lynx vs. 1983 Mini MK V
To start off, 2004 Ford Lynx is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mini MK V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mini MK V would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Ford Lynx is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Lynx (108 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1983 Mini MK V. (41 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Lynx should accelerate faster than 1983 Mini MK V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Lynx weights approximately 485 kg more than 1983 Mini MK V. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Lynx (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Mini MK V. (70 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Lynx will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Mini MK V.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Lynx | 1983 Mini MK V | |
Make | Ford | Mini |
Model | Lynx | MK V |
Year Released | 2004 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 41 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 70 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 625 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2040 mm |