2004 Ford Maverick vs. 1967 Jaguar 240
To start off, 2004 Ford Maverick is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Jaguar 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Jaguar 240 (208 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 2004 Ford Maverick. (122 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Jaguar 240 should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Maverick. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Jaguar 240 weights approximately 5 kg more than 2004 Ford Maverick. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Jaguar 240 (300 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Maverick. (175 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1967 Jaguar 240 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Maverick.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Maverick | 1967 Jaguar 240 | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | Maverick | 240 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1983 cc | 3442 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.1:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 1520 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 54 L |