2004 Ford Maverick vs. 1980 Lotus Eclat

To start off, 2004 Ford Maverick is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Lotus Eclat. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Lotus Eclat would be higher. At 1,983 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Ford Maverick is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Maverick weights approximately 465 kg more than 1980 Lotus Eclat.

Because 2004 Ford Maverick is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Lotus Eclat. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Maverick will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Ford Maverick 1980 Lotus Eclat
Make Ford Lotus
Model Maverick Eclat
Year Released 2004 1980
Engine Position Front Middle
Engine Size 1983 cc 1971 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 122 HP 0 HP
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1515 kg 1050 kg
Vehicle Length 4420 mm 4460 mm
Vehicle Width 1830 mm 1820 mm
Vehicle Height 1780 mm 1210 mm
Wheelbase Size 2730 mm 2490 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]