2004 Ford Maverick vs. 2012 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Maverick. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Maverick would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 2004 Ford Maverick. (122 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Maverick.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser (232 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Maverick. (175 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2012 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Maverick.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Maverick | 2012 Citroen C-Crosser | |
Make | Ford | Citroen |
Model | Maverick | C-Crosser |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1983 cc | 2359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 232 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84.9 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |