2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1946 Peugeot 202
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Peugeot 202. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Peugeot 202 would be higher. At 3,801 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (190 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 160 more horse power than 1946 Peugeot 202. (30 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1946 Peugeot 202. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 706 kg more than 1946 Peugeot 202. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Mustang | 1946 Peugeot 202 | |
Make | Ford | Peugeot |
Model | Mustang | 202 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1946 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3801 cc | 1133 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 30 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 97 mm | 68 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 78 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1492 kg | 786 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1510 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2460 mm |