2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1949 Jeep CJ2A

To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Jeep CJ2A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Jeep CJ2A would be higher. At 3,801 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (190 HP) has 131 more horse power than 1949 Jeep CJ2A. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1949 Jeep CJ2A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 382 kg more than 1949 Jeep CJ2A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1949 Jeep CJ2A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1949 Jeep CJ2A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (298 Nm) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 1949 Jeep CJ2A. (145 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1949 Jeep CJ2A.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Ford Mustang 1949 Jeep CJ2A
Make Ford Jeep
Model Mustang CJ2A
Year Released 2004 1949
Body Type Coupe SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3801 cc 2199 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 190 HP 59 HP
Torque 298 Nm 145 Nm
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Vehicle Weight 1492 kg 1110 kg
Vehicle Length 4660 mm 3130 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1460 mm
Vehicle Height 1360 mm 1630 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2040 mm