2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1950 Holden FX
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 4,589 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (390 HP) has 339 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 746 kg more than 1950 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (529 Nm) has 393 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Holden FX. (136 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Mustang | 1950 Holden FX | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | Mustang | FX |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1950 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4589 cc | 2165 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 390 HP | 51 HP |
| Torque | 529 Nm | 136 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1716 kg | 970 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2620 mm |
