2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1950 Talbot T 26
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Talbot T 26. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Talbot T 26 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Talbot T 26 (276 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 2004 Ford Mustang. (260 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1950 Talbot T 26 should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 603 kg more than 1950 Talbot T 26.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Mustang | 1950 Talbot T 26 | |
| Make | Ford | Talbot |
| Model | Mustang | T 26 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1950 |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 4482 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 260 HP | 276 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1518 kg | 915 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2510 mm |
