2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1952 Ford Crestline
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 4,009 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (211 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 1952 Ford Crestline. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford Crestline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 40 kg more than 1952 Ford Crestline. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Mustang | 1952 Ford Crestline | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | Mustang | Crestline |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4009 cc | 3929 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 211 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 5030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1890 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2940 mm |
