2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1953 Ford 12 M
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 4,009 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (211 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 174 more horse power than 1953 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1953 Ford 12 M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Mustang | 1953 Ford 12 M | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | Mustang | 12 M |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4009 cc | 1172 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 211 HP | 37 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1620 mm |
