2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1954 Talbot T 26
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Talbot T 26. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Talbot T 26 would be higher. At 4,482 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Talbot T 26 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (211 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1954 Talbot T 26. (198 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1954 Talbot T 26. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Talbot T 26 weights approximately 90 kg more than 2004 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Mustang | 1954 Talbot T 26 | |
| Make | Ford | Talbot |
| Model | Mustang | T 26 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1954 |
| Engine Size | 4009 cc | 4482 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 211 HP | 198 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1610 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1890 mm |
