2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1954 Talbot T 26
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Talbot T 26. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Talbot T 26 would be higher. At 4,482 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Talbot T 26 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Talbot T 26 (198 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2004 Ford Mustang. (191 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1954 Talbot T 26 should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Talbot T 26 weights approximately 312 kg more than 2004 Ford Mustang. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Mustang | 1954 Talbot T 26 | |
| Make | Ford | Talbot |
| Model | Mustang | T 26 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1954 |
| Engine Size | 3802 cc | 4482 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 191 HP | 198 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1610 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1890 mm |
