2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1955 Ford 12 M
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 4,589 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (390 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 353 more horse power than 1955 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1955 Ford 12 M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Mustang | 1955 Ford 12 M | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | Mustang | 12 M |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1955 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4589 cc | 1172 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 390 HP | 37 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2500 mm |
