2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1956 Isuzu Minx
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 4,009 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (211 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 174 more horse power than 1956 Isuzu Minx. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1956 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 554 kg more than 1956 Isuzu Minx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Mustang | 1956 Isuzu Minx | |
| Make | Ford | Isuzu |
| Model | Mustang | Minx |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1956 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4009 cc | 1265 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 211 HP | 37 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 966 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1580 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2370 mm |
