2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1957 Ford 12 M
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 4,589 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (390 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 353 more horse power than 1957 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1957 Ford 12 M. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 816 kg more than 1957 Ford 12 M. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Mustang | 1957 Ford 12 M | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Mustang | 12 M |
Year Released | 2004 | 1957 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4589 cc | 1172 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1716 kg | 900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1620 mm |