2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1957 Triumph TR3
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Triumph TR3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Triumph TR3 would be higher. At 4,009 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (211 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1957 Triumph TR3. (95 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1957 Triumph TR3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 595 kg more than 1957 Triumph TR3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Mustang | 1957 Triumph TR3 | |
| Make | Ford | Triumph |
| Model | Mustang | TR3 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1957 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4009 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 211 HP | 95 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 925 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1400 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1280 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2240 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 29 L |
