2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1957 Wartburg Sports Convertible

To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Wartburg Sports Convertible. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Wartburg Sports Convertible would be higher. At 3,801 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (190 HP) has 141 more horse power than 1957 Wartburg Sports Convertible. (49 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1957 Wartburg Sports Convertible. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 616 kg more than 1957 Wartburg Sports Convertible. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2004 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1957 Wartburg Sports Convertible, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (298 Nm) has 211 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Wartburg Sports Convertible. (87 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Wartburg Sports Convertible.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Ford Mustang 1957 Wartburg Sports Convertible
Make Ford Wartburg
Model Mustang Sports Convertible
Year Released 2004 1957
Body Type Coupe Convertible
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3801 cc 900 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 3 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 190 HP 49 HP
Torque 298 Nm 87 Nm
Engine Bore Size 97 mm 70 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86 mm 78 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.3:1 7.8:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1492 kg 876 kg
Vehicle Length 4660 mm 4370 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1620 mm
Vehicle Height 1360 mm 1360 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2460 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 59 L 40 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]