2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1959 Triumph Herald
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 4,009 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (200 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 1959 Triumph Herald. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1959 Triumph Herald. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 762 kg more than 1959 Triumph Herald. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (321 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 237 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Triumph Herald. (84 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Triumph Herald.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Mustang | 1959 Triumph Herald | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | Mustang | Herald |
Year Released | 2004 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4009 cc | 1147 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 321 Nm | 84 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 100.4 mm | 69.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.4 mm | 76 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1542 kg | 780 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2320 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 29 L |