2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1960 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 4,009 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (200 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (321 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 205 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (116 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Mustang | 1960 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Mustang | Cedric |
Year Released | 2004 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4009 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 321 Nm | 116 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2540 mm |