2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1960 Triumph Herald
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 4,009 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (211 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 1960 Triumph Herald. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1960 Triumph Herald. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 760 kg more than 1960 Triumph Herald. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (310 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 227 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Triumph Herald. (83 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Triumph Herald.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Mustang | 1960 Triumph Herald | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | Mustang | Herald |
Year Released | 2004 | 1960 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4009 cc | 1147 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 211 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 310 Nm | 83 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 8.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 760 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2320 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 29 L |