2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1961 Land Rover A 109
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Land Rover A 109. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Land Rover A 109 would be higher. At 3,802 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (190 HP) has 123 more horse power than 1961 Land Rover A 109. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1961 Land Rover A 109. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Land Rover A 109 weights approximately 6 kg more than 2004 Ford Mustang.
Because 1961 Land Rover A 109 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1961 Land Rover A 109 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (298 Nm) has 141 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Land Rover A 109. (157 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Land Rover A 109.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Mustang | 1961 Land Rover A 109 | |
Make | Ford | Land Rover |
Model | Mustang | A 109 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1961 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3802 cc | 2286 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 298 Nm | 157 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1494 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 2070 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2780 mm |