2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1962 Cadillac Park Avenue
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Park Avenue. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Park Avenue would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Park Avenue is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Mustang | 1962 Cadillac Park Avenue | |
| Make | Ford | Cadillac |
| Model | Mustang | Park Avenue |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4009 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 5470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 3300 mm |
