2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1962 Morgan 4
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 4,009 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (211 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 156 more horse power than 1962 Morgan 4. (55 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1962 Morgan 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 860 kg more than 1962 Morgan 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Mustang | 1962 Morgan 4 | |
Make | Ford | Morgan |
Model | Mustang | 4 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4009 cc | 1340 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 211 HP | 55 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2450 mm |