2004 Ford Mustang vs. 1962 Volvo 220
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 4,009 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (211 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 1962 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1962 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 505 kg more than 1962 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (310 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Volvo 220. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Volvo 220.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Mustang | 1962 Volvo 220 | |
| Make | Ford | Volvo |
| Model | Mustang | 220 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4009 cc | 1778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 211 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 310 Nm | 144 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2300 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1015 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 45 L |
